Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Lung cancer

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    National Multi-Center Observational Retrospective Study to Understand Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Turkey: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Study, STONE Trial
    (AKAD DOKTORLAR YAYINEVI, 2022-01-01) Onal, Cem; Demiral, Ayse Nur; Atalar, Banu; Yalman, Deniz; Dagoglu, Nergiz; Hurmuz, Pervin; Erpolat, Petek; Akyurek, Serap; Gul, Sute Karabulut; Berber, Tanju; Guler, Ozan Cem; Umay, Cenk; Sert, Fatma; Karahacioglu, Eray; Birgi, Sumerya Duru; Yaprak, Gokhan; Saglam, Esra Kaytan
    This study investigated treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) in Turkey. We included 492 patients with stage III NSCLC in this multi-center retrospective study. Pa-tient demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical treatment patterns from the time of the initial diagnosis to disease progression were recorded. Additionally, the prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. For the initial treatment, 429 patients (89.2\%) received chemotherapy and RT, whereas 53 patients (10.8\%) were treated only with RT. The first disease progression occurred in 288 patients (58.4\%) at 9.3 months (median) after the initial treatment, and 64.6\% re-ceived treatment after first progression. The second disease progression occurred in 30 patients, and 20 patients (66.7\%) received treatment. Median OS and PFS were 27.0 months and 13.4 months, respectively. Age (p< 0.001), stage (p= 0.04), poor performance score (PS) (p= 0.03) and RT doses (p= 0.002) were independent predictors for OS and PFS in our multivariate analysis. Additional significant predictors for OS in the multivariate analysis were gender (p= 0.004), treatment period (0.02), and irradiation technique (p= 0.02). Disease progression occurred in nearly 58\% of the patients, and one-third of these patients remained untreated during the disease progression. These findings indicate a need for additional treatment options in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC with high-risk features, namely older age, stage IIIB disease, poor PS, and lower RT doses.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Staging with PET-CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer is Superior to Conventional Staging Methods in Terms of Survival
    (ASIAN PACIFIC ORGANIZATION CANCER PREVENTION, 2013-01-01) Mutlu, Hasan; Buyukcelik, Abdullah; Erden, Abdulsamet; Aslan, Tuncay; Akca, Zeki; Kaya, Eser; Kibar, Mustafa; Seyrek, Ertugrul; Yavuz, Sinan; Calikusu, Zuleyha
    Background: Of patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), around one third are locally advanced at the time of diagnosis. Because only a proprotion of stage III patients can be cured by surgery, in order to improve the outcomes, sequential or concurrent chemoradiation, or concurrent chemoradiation with induction or consolidation is offered to the patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Today, PET combined with computerized tomography (PET-CT) is accepted as the most sensitive technique for detecting mediastinal lymph node and extracranial metastases from NSCLC. We aimed to compare PET-CT and conventional staging procedures for decisions regarding curative treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A total of 168 consecutive patients were included from Acibadem Kayseri Hospital, Acibadem Adana Hospital and Kayseri Research and Training Hospital in this study. Results: While the median PFS was 13.0 +/- 1.9 months in the PET-CT group, it was only 6.0 +/- 0.9 in the others (p<0.001). The median OS values were 20.5 +/- 15.6 and 11.5 +/- 1.5 months, respectively (p<0.001). Discussion: As a result, we found that staging with PET CT has better results in terms of survival staging. This superiority leads to survival advantage in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Does Sunlight Exposure Improve Survival in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?
    (ASIAN PACIFIC ORGANIZATION CANCER PREVENTION, 2013-01-01) Mutlu, Hasan; Buyukcelik, Abdullah; Aksahin, Arzu; Kibar, Mustafa; Cihan, Yasemin Benderli; Kaya, Eser; Seyrek, Ertugrul; Yavuz, Sinan; Erden, Abdulsamet; Calikusu, Zuleyha; Aslan, Tuncay; Akca, Zeki
    Background: Some epidemiological studies reported that sunlight exposure and highvitamin D levels may decrease the morbidity and mortality related to cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether sunlight exposure has an impact on survival in patients with non small cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 546 patients with NSCLC from two different regions (Kayseri and Adana) differing according to sunlight exposure were analysed retrospectively. Results: The median overall survival (OS) rates were 11. 6 (CI: 9.50-13.6) and 15.6 months (CI: 12.4-18.8) for Kayseri and Adana, respectively, in all patients (p=0.880). Conclusions: There were no differences between groups in terms of OS. While there is strong evidence regarding inverse relationship between cancer incidence and sunlight exposure, it is still controversial whether sunlight exposure is a good prognostic factor for survival in patients with lung cancer.