Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.laparoscopic surgery

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001)
    (MDPI, 2021-01-01) Vardar, Mehmet Ali; Guzel, Ahmet Baris; Taskin, Salih; Gungor, Mete; Ozgul, Nejat; Salman, Coskun; Kucukgoz-Gulec, Umran; Khatib, Ghanim; Taskiran, Cagatay; Duender, Ilkkan; Ortac, Firat; Yuce, Kunter; Terek, Cosan; Simsek, Tayup; Ozsaran, Aydin; Onan, Anil; Coban, Gonca; Topuz, Samet; Demirkiran, Fuat; Takmaz, Ozguc; Kose, M. Faruk; Gocmen, Ahmet; Seydaoglu, Gulsah; Gumurdulu, Derya; Ayhan, Ali
    This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high-intermediate- and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high-intermediate- and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5\%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45\%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7\%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Morcellation in gynecology: short review and suggestions from Turkish Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology
    (GALENOS YAYINCILIK, 2021-01-01) Taskin, Salih; Varli, Bulut; Yalcin, Ibrahim; Ortac, Firat; Taskiran, Cagatay; Gungor, Mete
    Morcellation allows the removal of a large uterus and fibroids through small incisions with minimally invasive surgery. It helps to prevent the complications associated with large incisions in both hysterectomy and myomectomy operations. Currently, there is much debate regarding the use of power morcellation in laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy, mainly due to the risk of peritoneal dissemination of undiagnosed uterine sarcomas. Unfortunately, there is no valid pre-operative diagnostic method that can differentiate sarcomas from myomas, and the currently available scientific literature regarding morcellation is insufficient. As the Turkish Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecological Oncology, we present our consensus opinion and suggestions for the preoperative evaluation and morcellation of fibroids, in line with the recent literature.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of perioperative outcomes among robot-assisted, conventional laparoscopic, and abdominal/open myomectomies
    (GALENOS YAYINCILIK, 2021-01-01) Ozbasli, Esra; Gungor, Mete
    Objective: To compare the perioperative results of myomectomy performed by robotic surgery (RM), laparoscopic surgery (LM), and open/abdominal surgery (OM). Material and Methods: We included 227 patients who underwent either robotic (n=66), laparoscopic (n=88), or abdominal (n=73) myomectomy at our hospital between 2016 and 2020. Retrospective medical records, including fibroid characteristics, demographic findings, and surgical outcomes, were compared. Results: The RM group had a significantly lower body mass index and significantly larger uterine size, myoma diameter, and myoma weight than the other groups. However, the OM group had the highest number of myoma. Moreover, the RM group had higher operative time and blood loss but significantly lower maximum visual analog scale values than the OM and LM groups. Hospitalization duration was significantly different among the groups. The rate of 1-day hospitalization was 56.2\%, 64.8\%, and 37.9\% in the OM, LM, and RM groups, respectively. Furthermore, blood transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the OM group (12.3\%) than in the LM and RM groups (0.0\% and 4.5\%, respectively). Conclusion: Minimally invasive myomectomy may be preferable, particularly for women of reproductive age. In women with large uterine size and myoma, robot-assisted LM is recommended.