Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.laboratory error

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge
    (CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY \& LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021-01-01) Emre, Humeyra Ozturk; Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande; Coskun, Cihan; Sezer, Ebru Demirel; Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu; Ucar, Fatma; Cubukcu, Hikmet Can; Arslan, Fatma Demet; Deniz, Levent; Senes, Mehmet; Serteser, Mustafa; Yazici, Cevat; Yucel, Dogan; Coskun, Abdurrahman
    Introduction: To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of test results. Materials and methods: This study uses a questionnaire comprising open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions were selected from the real-life numerical examples of interpretation of test results, the knowledge about main sources of variations in laboratories and the opinion of clinicians on BV. A total of 399 clinicians were interviewed, and the answers were evaluated using a scoring system ranked from A (clinician has the highest level of knowledge and the ability of using BV data) to D (clinician has no knowledge about variations in laboratory). The results were presented as number (N) and percentage (\%). Results: Altogether, 60.4\% of clinicians have knowledge of pre-analytical and analytical variations
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sigma metric revisited: True known mistakes
    (CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY \& LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019-01-01) Coskun, Abdurrahman; Serteser, Mustafa; Unsal, Ibrahim
    Six Sigma methodology has been used successfully in industry since the mid-1980s. Unfortunately, the same success has not been achieved in laboratory medicine. In this case, although the multidisciplinary structure of laboratory medicine is an important factor, the concept and statistical principles of Six Sigma have not been transferred correctly from industry to laboratory medicine. Furthermore, the performance of instruments and methods used in laboratory medicine is calculated by a modified equation that produces a value lower than the actual level. This causes unnecessary, increasing pressure on manufacturers in the market. We concluded that accurate implementation of the sigma metric in laboratory medicine is essential to protect both manufacturers by calculating the actual performance level of instruments, and patients by calculating the actual error rates.